Tuesday 19 November 2013

Man and Environment – A Working Class Perspective.

Anoop Varghese Kuriappuram

I am writing this when there is increasing bonhomie about western ghats  and  Kasthuri Rangan/ Madhav Gadgil Report. Kasthuri Rangan report as every one understands is a mere technical report and it compromises the scientific base in which Madhav Gadgil report is built. It is not within the scope of this document to compare these. Discussion point that we raise here is what the working class approach should be towards nature.

Industrial revolution and free market theory always aims at exploiting natural resources to extract profits and it does not have adequate care towards replenishing the same. Barren lands which is left after mineral explorations are just one example of what consumerism will lead to. Species started vanishing from planet, biodiversity taking a hit and man’s quality of living is coming down in terms of basic livelihood parameters such as water, air and food. Increasingly, water is becoming polluted with portable drinking water sources getting scarce. Air’s quality is worsening with industrial and vehicular pollution hitting a new high. Ozone layer is getting depleted in rapid pace with CFC’s  emissions unbridled. Temperature of earth is getting warmer as rightly pointed out by IPCC of United Nations. Food is getting contaminated by pesticides, chemical fertilisers and unhealthy processing practices.

Interestingly some corporates are thriving  in the business of capitalising on this decline of quality of life.

·       For Polluted water,  corporates offer purifiers, mega desalinisers and water   supply schemes.
·         For Increase Temperature, they offer air conditioners and air coolers
·         For Contaminated food, offer is organic food
·         For Medical Ailments, offer is 5 star treatment
·         For Huge waste generated, it has proposal of big processing plants and incirators.

Workers organisations, industrial bodies and governments tend to bring the angle of economic parameters such as  gross domestic product and employment into these critical issues. Arguments are being put forward such as for employment , exploiting the nature is Marxist view .In this, trade unions are sadly taking a view which is protective of capitalist enterprise and  is working  some time as apostles for them.

Let us come back and examine this critical issue from a Marxist perspective.

Employment by itself is not a right or a must  in a classless society. Employment should be directed towards welfare of society and replenishment of the natural resources. The historical perspective which we should ingrain is “natural resources are finite”. Then comes the word called sustainability. When a corporate speaks about sustainable theme, it will be always directed at maintaining it’s bottom line by a set of activities. Working class should be seeking “Sustainable Employment” than “Destructive Employment” from its higher class consciousness.

Now what approach should working class take in this?

Points to be kept in mind while examining this holistically are the livelihood of human beings and the famous idiom that “without wall there can be no wall painting”. Technological and scientific advances should be evaluated exhaustively before putting them into use. Market forces tend to go ahead with new advances and government system is doing a catch up later. Working class in return of the employment received ,tend to be protective of the environment destructing attitude of capitalists. It is a historically wrong perspective and contrary to the commitment working class should be showing to the society.
Working class holistically should drive struggle and correct environmental issues that it’s operating concern is producing. There should be a pledge from working class that “Boycott employers who does not adhere to environmental standards”. A “Zero Emission Industrial Enterprise” should be the slogan, we should be supporting. This is the short term solution.

It is not enough to do the above, but we need to push for an alternate economy. An economy which is driven by plan and not by demand-supply theory.  We should understand that supply of natural resources are limited. We should recognise  that reckless market mechanism  is producing waste and causing environmental impacts and is making life in Planet Earth Miserable.

Government should be in control of all natural resources and services and private ownership should be limited. Production required in the economy should be forecast by the government and suitable mechanism should strive to produce the same. For Industrial goods and services also same should apply.

An Imaginative working class government for example

1) will construct an extensive railway network, where people can carry their private cars across countries than a 6 lane highway where people need to drive, put fuel and make pollution to reach destination. 

2) Housing will be recognised as a right and not as an investment, government shall provide space or flats for each of citizen rather than allowing builders/land mafia to take advantage of working class.

Imaginative measures which will increase quality of life should be the agenda of the government than any figures such as GDP. Individual freedom should not be curtailed but options should be provided to achieve the same with minimum ecological impact.

Right to Housing, Employment, Food, Quality Air and Water should be made fundamental right of each citizen and working class government should be in charge of achieving the same. Jobs should be created to conserve and replenish the natural resources than exploiting the same. All market driven practices which are harmful to nature should be banned (such as pesticides use will be banned). 

A Social audit mechanism will be there to examine and allow use of all technologies or advances before their use.

Ultimate aim will be to topple the capitalist regime, which is driving this anti environment policies and establish a working class governing structure.

4 comments:

  1. പ്രകൃതിയും മനുഷ്യനും ആയുള്ള ബന്ധന്തിന്റെയും, ആ ബന്ധത്തിന് കോർപ്പറേറ്റ് മുതലാളിത്തം മൂലമുണ്ടാകുന്ന മാറ്റങ്ങളെയും കുറിച്ചുള്ള ഒരു മാർക്സിയൻ വിശകലനത്തിന് ഇന്ന് വലിയ കാലിക പ്രസക്തിയുണ്ട്. ഈ വിഷയത്തിൽ പ്രകൃതി ഉപാസകരുടെ കാല്പനിക വിഡ്ഢിത്തങ്ങൾ പിൻപറ്റാൻ മർക്സിസ്റ്റുകൽക്കു പറ്റില്ല. എന്നാൽ മുതലാളിത്തം പ്രകൃതിക്ക് മേൽ നടത്തിക്കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുന്ന നഗ്നമായ ആക്രമണത്തെ ന്യായാകരിക്കാനും ആകില്ല. പ്രകൃതി സംബന്ദമായ എല്ലാ പ്രശ്നങ്ങിളിലും കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റ്‌ പാർട്ടികൾ കൃത്യമായ വീക്ഷണത്തിന്റെ അഭാവം കൊണ്ട് ഇരുട്ടിൽ തപ്പുന്ന സ്ഥിതിയാണ് ഉള്ളത്. അതിനാൽ ഈ ലേഖനം ഒരു നല്ല തുടക്കമാണ്. ഇതിലേ ആശയങ്ങളുമായി ഒരുപാട് വിയോജിപ്പുകൾ ഈയുള്ളവന് ഉണ്ട്, എങ്കിലും ഇത് ഒരു തുറന്ന ചർച്ചക്ക് വഴിതെളിക്കും.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Red salute to your good mind!
    I almost fully agree with your all "should be"s. You are claiming that you are examining this issue on a 'Marxixt perspective'. Those "Marxixts" who have opposing arguments also have the same claim! So you have the responsibility to substantiate this claim.

    Sasneham
    Mathai

    ReplyDelete
  3. The very concept of all the productive forces under Govt Control need to be re examined once again. The very Govt,even if constituted under a revolutionary leader becomes the curtailer of fundamental rights of its citizens .The social nature of Governance is lost after sometime and the protection of the leader and the vital organs of the institution he has formulated becomes the fundamental nature of governance.So instead of people orientation and delivery,the productive forces become inefficient and rotten. The existing concept of governance under a socialistic regime need to be critically analysed and a new regime structure need to be formulated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment for me epitomizes the lack of clarity in theoretical matters even among "left oriented" people regarding Marxist-Leninist revolutionary politics. The first thing that has to be understood is that total state control of the productive forces is possible only after the proletarian revolution and under a proletarian dictatorship. Such a state will and is by definition a curtailer of "fundamental rights of citizens" in the vulgar bourgeois sense; that is exactly why it is called a dictatorship. Such a regime does not have "people orientation", it has only a very clear proletarian orientation. No Marxist worth his name will buy the claim that we are living in a "democracy", we understand, as Lenin did 100 years ago, that behind this facade of "democracy" what is being played out is the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Proletarian revolution shall aim at replacing this with the dictatorship of the proletariat whose main aim shall be to re orient the productive forces and thereby the cultural mood to make the transition to communism a possibility. Such a state is not, as Anilkumar imagines, the protector of "fundamental" rights of the "people" but it is a ruthless dictatorship set to squash the bourgeoisie. If anyone thinks that "The existing concept of governance under a socialistic regime need to be critically analysed and a new regime structure need to be formulated", he is free to do so, but first he has to make sure that he reads "State and Revolution" and figure out a system as opposed to Lenin's.

      BB.

      Delete